Executive Summary
| Introduction |
The Universities Space Research Association (USRA) of Columbia, Maryland, is
a not-for-profit membership corporation that provides universities and other
organizations the means to cooperate in the development of knowledge
associated with space science and technology. USRA's principal program is
to operate laboratories and other facilities under contracts, grants, and
cooperative agreements mainly with the Federal Government for research,
development, and education associated with space science and technology.
As the cognizant audit agency for USRA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) performed a quality control review of USRA's audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998. The audit is required by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." The office of Ernst & Young LLP, Washington, D.C., performed the single audit for USRA. The USRA reported total Federal expenditures of $75,816,364 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998, from awards provided by NASA. Appendix A provides details on the single audit requirements, and Appendix B is a glossary of the terms used in this report.
|
| Objectives |
The objectives of our quality control review were to determine whether the
audit was conducted in accordance with applicable standards and whether the
audit meets the auditing and reporting requirements of OMB Circular A-133.
See Appendixes C and D for details on the objectives, scope, and
methodology.
|
| Results of Review |
Ernst & Young LLP issued its audit report on USRA on September 11, 1998.
The auditors identified no findings and questioned no costs. Ernst & Young
LLP issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, Schedule of
Federal Awards(1) and major program compliance. The auditors also found no
instances of noncompliance in the financial statement audit that are
required to be reported under generally accepted government auditing
standards. Finally, the auditors noted no matters involving internal
controls relating to the financial statement or major programs that are
considered to be material weaknesses.
The Ernst & Young LLP audit work and report generally meets the applicable
auditing and reporting guidance and regulatory requirements contained in:
(1) OMB Circular A-133 and its related Compliance Supplement, (2) generally
accepted government auditing standards; and (3) generally accepted auditing
standards. The auditors need to improve working paper documentation
(Finding A), correct major program reporting (Finding B), and obtain
training specifically related to the single audit requirements (Finding C).
Additionally, the audit report must be revised to identify the Federal
agencies whose expenditures are presented in the Schedule of Federal Awards
and include notes to the Schedule that describe the significant accounting
policies used.
|
| Recommendations |
We recommend that USRA management prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of
Federal Awards and its related notes in accordance with OMB Circular A-133.
We also recommend that Ernst & Young LLP:
|
| USRA Response |
The Schedule of Federal Awards is being revised to reflect the USRA programs
as major programs within the research and development cluster, identify the
Federal agencies, and include appropriate footnotes to the Schedule.
|
| Ernst & Young LLP's Response |
Documentation of the auditors' thought processes and other matters discussed
during the audit can be improved. Ernst & Young will participate in the
revision to the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for fiscal year
1998. Ernst & Young LLP will prepare a letter to the Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census (the collecting agent for OMB on the Data
Collection Form), advising the Bureau to identify all contracts listed on
the June 30, 1998, Data Collection Form as "major program." Ernst & Young
and USRA will jointly sign the letter. Finally, personnel for the USRA
audit will obtain training in the revised Circular A-133 requirements.
|
| Evaluation of the USRA and Ernst & Young LLP Response |
Both responses meet the intent of the recommendations.
|